Skip to main content

Featured

A Decade After Her Rise Misty Copeland Shifts The World of Ballet Once Again

 For maybe two months I’d have random moments of quick thoughts. Although quick, they were important. They were worth pondering in my mind because, whenever it actually came true, it’d mean things in dance, things in ballet are really changing. Those quick, repetitive thoughts were about the retirement of Misty Danielle Copeland.  Today was the today. Today is when I actually read the news. Although I’d been having thoughts of the inevitable, reading that NY Times headline made me feel more mentally prepared than I assumed. Allow me to explain. I recognize the retirement of Misty Copeland, just about on the heels of Gillian Murphy's, to be an announcement of a monumental shift in ballet. When I was a high school dancer, the most beautiful dancers— the dancers I looked up to, seemed to dance forever. While companies are looking younger and social media is hailing as a prominent stimulant to detect and experience true artistry, the turning of the tide is truly here.  I’ll b...

Should Period Piece Choreography Be Banished

 A work that is strongly reminiscent of an earlier historical period is a basic definition of period piece. Even aside from works that are strictly created around a time in history, choreographic pieces that challenged the way audiences perceive white and black bodies intertwined in beauty and grace on stage is not a new concept. My favorite example of this is the work of art that is Agon. Diana Adams and Arthur Mitchell did the unthinkable at the expanded mind of George Balanchine. Presenting a white woman on stage with a black man; making intimate discoveries through proximity and innovative choreography, the team of three made a statement. Has dance evolved from December 1, 1957?

Period pieces can take the form of an entire work, involving everything from costuming to re-telling the account in it's entirety or smaller sections within a large work that presents imagery through costume pieces giving indications of the times or dancers who resemble the physical characteristics of a certain people or a single person. Should that be a thing? Should choreographers have the right to cast and create based on their vision, to the extent of which they decide to build their work of art?

Dance is an art of vulnerability and pliability, in its expressive nature demanding truthfulness. Connecting to what you are wanting to express is truthful. Portraying characters is vulnerability and moving through process with different roles is pliability. In mostly every work there is a character being portrayed. Tapping into that takes a same level of commitment. That is part of dance— its profession.

This understanding also follows pieces and choreography that stands to tell the story of or bring representation of a certain people, person, place or thing. So far I have danced the role of a mother or mother figure throughout my career. From undergrad to professional work this role has followed me. Apparently I carry a motherly feel or mature essence. This is the same idea with period pieces and specific concepts. Choreographers reserve the right to choose who and what they think fits their work. The process should be truthful above all. If that includes a certain period in history or the life of a person or people, those details are needed for authenticity. 

While there is room for diversity in casting, the same is true for liberty in casting. These decisions should strictly be to honor and serve the work.

 

Comments

Popular Posts